Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾Çµ¿ °Å»ó¼úÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ ÈÄ »ýÁ¸À²¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸

The retrospective study of survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 39±Ç 3È£ p.293 ~ 301
À¯Á¤¾Æ, Á¤ÀÇ¿ø, ÃÖ¼ºÈ£, Á¶±Ô¼º, ±è⼺, ÀÌ»ó¹Î, À¯¹Ì°æ, ¹ÚÇʱÔ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À¯Á¤¾Æ ( Yoo Jung-A ) - ¼­¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø Ä¡°ú
Á¤ÀÇ¿ø ( Jung Ui-Won ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ¼ºÈ£ ( Choi Seong-Ho ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶±Ô¼º ( Cho Kyoo-Sung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
±è⼺ ( Kim Chang-Sung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»ó¹Î ( Lee Sang-Min ) - ¼­¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø Ä¡°ú
À¯¹Ì°æ ( Yoo Mi-Kyung ) - ¼­¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø Ä¡°ú
¹ÚÇʱԠ( Park Pil-Kyoo ) - ¼­¿ïº¸Èƺ´¿ø Ä¡°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study is to show the total survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation and the effects that reach the survival rate by classifying types of graft materials, implant surface, operation method, bone height.

Methods: In a total of 131 patients, 251 implants with sinus floor elevation were installed simultaneously or after regular healing. Various bone grafts (autograft, xonograft, allograft, alloplast) and implant surface (MTX-HA implant, chemical etching implant, Titanium oxide surface implant, resorbable blasting media implant, resorbable blast texturing implant, HA-coated implant) were used. All implants were investigated clinically and radiographically, being with 1 to 5 years follow- up period after installation.

Results: The survival rate of 251 implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation was 94%. The types of implant, surface, graft material, bone height have no statistically signi-ficant differencies.

Conclusions: It can be suggested that maxillary sinus floor elevation may have predictable result with various bone graft materials and implant surface.

Å°¿öµå

maxillary sinus;dental implants;survival rate

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI